Anthony Brophy v Norbrook Laboratories Ltd [2014]
Decision Number: Legal Body: Northern Ireland Industrial Tribunal
Published on: 03/10/2014
Issues Covered:
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Background

This was a claim of unfair dismissal and the claimant denied that he had been guilty of gross misconduct and alleged that the investigation carried out by Mr Canavan (Group Packaging Manager of the respondent) had been flawed on the basis that he was biased and had an interest in the outcome of the investigation. It was also suggested that the outcome of the disciplinary procedure had been predetermined prior to the disciplinary procedure commencing. 

The events arose out of allegations that stock had been stolen from the respondent and the claimant was subsequently invited to an investigatory meeting after which he was suspended on full pay. A disciplinary meeting was held, after which the claimant was dismissed for

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 03/10/2014