Ferreira da Silva e Brito & others v Estado Português (Case C-160/14)
Decision Number: Legal Body: Court of Justice of the European Union
Published on: 27/10/2015
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Dr John McMullen Partner
Dr John McMullen Partner
Dr john mcmullen

John is an employment Partner at Spencer West as well as being Visiting Professor of Law at Leeds University Business School and serving on the editorial board of ELA Briefing, the journal of the Employment Lawyers Association. He was previously Head of Employment at Pinsent Masons.

John is one of the UK's leading employment lawyers with a national and international reputation. He is the country's leading expert on TUPE and is involved in a wide range of TUPE related matters, including service provision change, mergers and acquisitions, and public sector and third sector transfers.

He has been variously described as “the King of TUPE” and the “TUPE guru”. He is an expert in redundancies and restructuring and also provides advice to senior executives on termination of employment.

He is also:

  • the author of Business Transfers and Employee Rights, the leading work on TUPE. First published in 1987, it is a loose-leaf encyclopedia, known affectionately as the “purple book”, and is subscribed to by all major law libraries and law firms and by the Bar
  • the author of Redundancy: The Law and Practice, the leading work on redundancy law
  • an editor of Harvey on Industrial Relations and Employment Law, commonly known as the practitioner’s “bible” and regularly cited in Court.
Background

In Ferreira da Silva e Brito & others v Estado Português (Case C-160/14) the European Court considered the winding up of Air Atlantis and the taking over of its activities by its major shareholder TAP.  TAP disputed that there was a transfer of an undertaking.  But TAP took over the routes previously served by Air Atlantis and used significant assets, including four aeroplanes.  TAP also assumed responsibility for the payment of charges under the leasing contracts relating to those aircraft and took over the office equipment which belonged to Air Atlantis and which had been used at Air Atlantis' premises in Lisbon and Faro.  TAP also took on a number of former Air Atlantis employees.

The Portuguese Court had taken the view that TAP had simply taken over Air Atlantis' licence to operate.  The European Court, however, considered that there had been a transfer of an undertaking.

Of paramount importance was that this case concerned the air transport sector.  So the transfer of the assets necessary to operate Air Atlantis' business (the aircraft) was crucial.

Secondly, it was immaterial that Air Atlantis lost its autonomy following the TAP takeover.  Following the case of Klarenberg (Case C-466/07) the Court confirmed that a loss of autonomy does not prevent a TUPE transfer.  This is provided that the various elements of production remain the same and are used by the new employer to carry out the same or similar activities.

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 27/10/2015