Geraldine Ann O’Hanlon v Leann Nicholson, t/a Sheer Glamour [2018]
Decision Number:
Published on: 16/08/2018
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Background

The claimant was employed as a hair stylist and worked 24 hours per week. The respondent decided to relocate premises, and initially offered the claimant reduced hours. The claimant was subsequently offered a new contract with the full 24 hours and it included a ‘shortage of work’ clause.

The claimant was not happy with the clause as it would have contractually enabled the respondent to send her home without pay. The claimant did not sign the contract and claimed that it was not a true reflection of her terms and conditions of employment. She argued that the reduction in hours, change of location and reduced wages represented a fundamental breach of her contract of employment and that it constituted constructive dismissal.

The tribunal found that the respondent had unilaterally varied the contract by inserting the shortage of work clause.  The tribunal rejected the respondent’s contention that the contract was unchanged and that the claimant’s job was available.  The introduction of the shortage of work clause was a new feature which effectively permitted the respondent to reduce the claimant’s hours of work and reduce her pay accordingly. The tribunal found that the claimant had been constructively dismissed.

Practical Lessons

Many employers can relate to downturns in business meaning fewer staff hours are required. But providing for this in employees’ contracts must be approached with caution.

There is a recognised right at common law to tell employees not to arrive for work but there is no general right not to pay them. This notion of ‘short-time working’ can only be imposed where there is a corresponding contractual right to do so or, although less likely, through custom and practice.

Unilaterally imposing short-term working on employees is risky and employers are better off being up-front with employees. A lot of redundancy policies will outline the employer’s responsibility to consider short-time working first as an alternative to redundancies and this may assist in securing the consent of affected employees.
http://www.employmenttribunalsni.co.uk/

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 16/08/2018