Hartley and others v King Edward VI College [2017]
Decision Number: UKSC 39
Published on: 25/05/2017
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Background

The appellants participated in strike action for one full day in November 2011. As a result, the respondent withheld part of their salary. Their contracts of employment incorporated terms relating to working time from a collective agreement known as the Red Book. The appellants argued the formula used to calculate the deduction was inaccurate, stating the correct calculation was 1/365 of their annual pay as opposed to 1/260.

The Red Book stipulates that teachers will be required to work up to 195 days a year of ‘directed time’. This includes teaching and other duties as specified in their contract of employment. In addition to directed time, a teacher is required to work an unspecified amount of ‘undirected time,’ owing to the wide range of responsibilities involved. The appellants regularly performed these undirected duties outside their normal working hours, for example, in the evenings and on weekends.

The appellants, relying on s.2 of the Apportionment Act 1870, argued their pay should accrue not only at a daily rate but also at an even rate. Lord Clarke, giving a unanimous decision, concluded a formula of 1/365 was ‘broadly fair’ as the work of a teacher is divided throughout the year. The Court confirmed it is not limited to when a teacher is undertaking the specific tasks as outlined in their contract of employment but includes undirected time, such as the marking of papers, preparing lessons, preparing teaching material and other duties that are reasonably required:

“In the context of an annual contract in which payment is monthly and, given the wide variety of work carried out, whether directed or undirected work, where there is no distinction between days upon which work is carried out and days upon which work is not carried out, the natural effect of the Act is that, as submitted on behalf of the appellants, the apportioned part of his salary on the day he was on strike was the same as any other day, namely 1/365 of his annual salary.”

The Apportionment Act applies where contracts do not have specific rules on how pay should be apportioned for various purposes and may not be applicable where workers do not work outside set days or where a rule on deductions is expressly written into terms and conditions of employment.

Full decision:
https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2015-0142-judgment.pdf

As always, UK Supreme Court decisions are summarised on YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caZ3i46WAFA

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 25/05/2017