Nixon v Royal Mail Group Limited 2019
Decision Number: 332576/2017 Legal Body: Employment Tribunal (England & Wales)
Published on: 16/05/2019
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Background

The claimant is employed by the respondent as a driver based at their Royal Mail National Distribution Centre. She argued that she suffered direct sex discrimination and/or harassment. The allegations related to the actions of a co-worker who pulled and attempted to pull the claimant’s hair and stated that she should be “back at home and in the kitchen”.

The respondent admitted the incidents amounted to direct discrimination/harassment but denied that the former related to the claimant’s sex. It contended that the employee could just as easily have pulled the long hair of a male employee.

The respondent subsequently offered all staff additional training on bullying and harassment. The employment judge upheld the claims and commented that “boys pulling

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 16/05/2019