O’Neill v Department for Social Development [2012]
Published on: 10/08/2012
Issues Covered:
Discrimination
Article Authors
The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Background
The claimant took a case against the Department for Social Development (DSD). The claimant was a 29 year-old Civil Servant who developed an aggressive form of Rheumatoid Arthritis. She requested a transfer closer to her County Londonderry home from Belfast where she was positioned. She was able to travel to work because of a scheme that allows 32her to take a taxi but that was due to end shortly. However, she was never offered a transfer opportunity in any of the three areas of her choice.The tribunal found the DSD operated a transfer policy which gave priority to non-disabled staff over disabled staff, with priority given to those who needed to be moved out of an area because they were no longer required there, than to those who required a transfer. They were also found not to be making reasonable adjustments to facilitate disabled employees. The tribunal found that the practical effect of the policy was to provide relative redeployment advantages to surplus staff, in preference to disabled staff at a time when a large number of surplus staff had to be redeployed. Consequently, it was held that the claimant had suffered discrimination because of her disability and she was awarded £7,500.http://bit.ly/QFxgIE
Continue reading
We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.
Already a subscriber?
Please log in to view the full article.
What you'll get:
- Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
- Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
- 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
- Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team
Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial
Disclaimer
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.
This article is correct at 10/08/2012
Recent Case Law
Morais v Ryanair DAC [2025]
21/01/2025
B (Trading as C) v A [2025]
21/01/2025
Duployen v Whyte & Mackay Ltd [2025]
14/01/2025
Q&A
How to handle it
Legal Island’s LMS, licensed to you
Imagine your staff having 24/7 access to a centralised training platform, tailored to your organisation’s brand and staff training needs, with unlimited users.
Learn more →
