Pimlico Plumbers Ltd & Anor v Smith [2018]
Decision Number: Legal Body: UK Supreme Court
Published on: 21/06/2018
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Background
Between August 2005 and April 2011 Mr Smith, who is by trade a plumbing and heating engineer, performed work for Pimlico Plumbers Ltd. When his contract was terminated he issued various employment tribunal claims, alleging he had been entitled to wages and holiday pay, amongst other things.

Mr Smith argued he was a 'worker' under S.230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (the equivalent of Article 3 (3)(b) of the Employment Rights (NI) Order 1996 in this jurisdiction) i.e. he was an individual who worked under any other contract, whether express or implied and (if it is express) whether oral or in writing, whereby the individual undertakes to do or perform personally any work or services for another party

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 21/06/2018