Re-Use Collections Ltd v Sendall & Anor [2014]
Decision Number: Legal Body: Court of Appeal (England and Wales)
Published on: 05/12/2014
Issues Covered:
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Background


Mr Sendall and some of his family members worked in the family recycling business and sold out to an Australian firm. Upon transfer of ownership, Mr Sendall was asked to sign a new contract, which included non-solicitation and non-competition restrictive covenants. Prior to the change of owner, Mr Sendall had no written contract or restrictive covenant terms, although he had written particulars of employment. He eventually signed his contract.

When his relatives set up a rival business (which the new owners alleged he was intimately involved in setting up with them) and Mr Sendall sought to join them, the new owners sought an injunction and relied on the terms of the restrictive covenant. Mr Sendall said it was unenforceable

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 05/12/2014