Latest in Employment Law>Case Law>Reyes and anor v Al-Malki and anor [2015]
Reyes and anor v Al-Malki and anor [2015]
Published on: 13/02/2015
Issues Covered: Discrimination
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Legal Island
Legal Island
Background

Does diplomatic immunity trump employment laws? It's not all that clear, as two recent and seemingly contradictory cases show.

Miss Reyes is a Philippine national. She is a victim of trafficking. She was employed as a domestic worker by the defendants at the official diplomatic residence of the Saudi Arabian mission in London. The defendants were a Saudi diplomatic agent and his wife. 

Ms Reyes brought proceedings in the Employment Tribunal claiming that she had suffered racial discrimination and harassment and had been paid less than the national minimum wage. The defendants successfully claimed that they were entitled to diplomatic immunity under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. 

There can be exceptions to diplomatic immunity e.g. “commercial activity exercised by the diplomatic agent in the receiving state (in this case the UK) outside his official functions”. However, the Court of Appeal has rejected any arguments that domestic workers fall into this commercial exception:

The employment of persons to provide domestic services in a diplomatic mission or an official diplomatic in the receiving state is conducive to the performance of diplomatic functions: it is not an action relating to “commercial activity” undertaken for the financial benefit of the diplomatic agent or relating to commercial activity “outside his official functions”. 

The Court went on to state that:

"The court recognises that this may seem unfair to Ms Reyes. But the outcome reflects policy choices that have been made on the international plane. The international community believes that diplomatic immunity not only ensures the efficient functioning of diplomatic missions in foreign states. It also fosters goodwill and enhances relations between nations. Sometimes the apparent unfairness to an individual is outweighed by the harm that would be caused by a failure to give effect to diplomatic immunity in circumstances such as those that have arisen in this case." 
http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/reyes-v-al-malki-judgment.pdf 

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 13/02/2015