Smith v HealthRota Ltd [2026]
Decision Number: Case No: 3200153/2024 Legal Body: Employment Tribunal (England & Wales)
Published on: 28/04/2026
Issues Covered:
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Jason Elliott BL Barrister & Associate Head of School of Law, Ulster University
Jason Elliott BL Barrister & Associate Head of School of Law, Ulster University
Jason elliott new
LinkedIn

Jason Elliott was called to the Bar of Northern Ireland in 2013 and is the Associate Head of School of Law at Ulster University.  As a practising barrister, he has developed a largely civil practice representing individuals, companies and public bodies in litigation. This covers a wide range of areas including personal injuries, wills and employment law. In terms of employment law, he has represented both applicants and respondents in the Industrial Tribunal.   At Ulster University, Jason lectures extensively on the civil areas of practise such as Equity and Trusts and delivers employment law lectures for both undergraduate and postgraduate students.

Claimant:
D Smith
Respondent:
HealthRota Ltd
Summary

As part of a remedy hearing the Tribunal provided a recommendation that there be diversity training undertaken by an independent individual within the respondent within 6 months of the decision.

Background

The claimant was successful at Tribunal in relation to disability discrimination.  A remedy hearing was listed and this was the decision relating to it.  The discrimination was the act of dismissal relating to ‘poor work performance’ but it was related to pain level and lack of sleep as a result of the claimant’s disability with a lack of reasonable adjustments being made.

Outcome

The Vento bands were applied and it was found that it was a one-off incident (i.e. dismissal) but it was one which caused distress and impact.  As a result, an award of £15,000 was made as being just and equitable in all of the circumstances.  There were also awards made for other aspects including relating to the dismissal.  Perhaps most interestingly, the Tribunal made a recommendation that within 6 months of the judgment the respondent’s senior management team is to engage an independent and appropriately qualified person to provide formal diversity training especially in relation to disability.  This was despite the fact that the claimant was no longer in their employment but demonstrates the extent to which the Tribunal may consider the organisation as a whole and how to ensure that such further incidences are avoided.

Practical Guidance

This remedy hearing provides a useful view of how the Tribunal may look beyond the monetary compensation and look to trying to improve industrial relations.  This was clear with the recommendation of having diversity training within six months of the judgment.  This is something to consider for employers should they face an issue relating to discrimination and the type of remedy and recommendation that may be given by the Tribunal.

You can read the case in full here.

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 28/04/2026