Latest in Employment Law>Case Law>Susan O’Kelly v WYG Engineering (Ireland) Limited (In Liquidation) [2013]
Susan O’Kelly v WYG Engineering (Ireland) Limited (In Liquidation) [2013]
Published on: 27/08/2013
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Bernadette Treanor
Bernadette Treanor
Background

The complainant was one of three people employed in finance roles with the respondent.  She had qualified with the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants.  Her two colleagues were male.  The complainant gave evidence that she always performed well in her role and got excellent appraisals.  The respondent, faced with restructuring in 2010, announced that the three posts were at risk and two new posts were being created.  One of the new roles attracted a salary of €45,000 focusing on balance sheet and the second attracted a salary of €55,000 focusing on profit and loss.  One of the three expressed no interest in the new posts and was made redundant.  The other, a part qualified male who was unmarried, had no children, had not completed his training and apparently had failed one or more of his ACCA exams, expressed an interest in the second new post as did the complainant who was fully qualified.  The part-qualified male colleague was successful while the complainant was unsuccessful in the interviews even though she was more qualified and had many more years experience in the Consulting Engineering sector than the successful male appointee.  She was made redundant in August 2010.

 

Others issues that arose in the case included the complainant’s line manager having previously asked the complainant how many children she had.  He also allegedly yawned and looked out the window during the complainant’s interview for the new role.  In addition, the complainant indicated that some answers recorded in the notes of the interview were not answers that she had provided or were low-level examples when she had also given high-level examples.  In particular, one response attributed to her related to depreciation and the complainant was adamant that she did not refer to depreciation at all during her interview while that would have been an area of work relevant to the successful candidate.

 

The Equality Officer referred to Wallace v South Eastern Education from the Northern Ireland Court of Appeal, NI 38[1980] IRLR 193 as authority for “the proposition that where a successful candidate for appointment to a post is a man and the unsuccessful but better qualified candidate is a woman, that fact alone is sufficient to establish a prima facie case of discrimination”.  The Equality Officer found that the complainant was a very cogent and credible witness.  She found that the complainant had established a prima facie case in respect of all three grounds referred, gender, marital status and family status which the respondent had failed to rebut.

 

She was awarded €45,000 as compensation which equates to approximately one year’s salary. 

 

Why is this case of interest?

  • It is a reminder that where a woman is more qualified but a job is awarded to a less qualified male it will automatically be accepted as a prima facie case requiring rebuttal from the employer.  This line will be applied across all of the discriminatory grounds.  This means that a person of a different race or a person with a disability who is more qualified than the successful candidate will almost automatically establish a prima facie case of discrimination on the relevant ground.

The respondent had gone into liquidation in August 2012 and its evidence was in the form of a written submission to the Tribunal in early August 2011.  

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 27/08/2013