Synott v A Patterson Company Ltd [2021]
Decision Number: 21765/20IT
Published on: 20/05/2021
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Jason Elliott BL Barrister & Lecturer of Law, Ulster University
Jason Elliott BL Barrister & Lecturer of Law, Ulster University
Jason elliott new
LinkedIn

Jason Elliott was called to the Bar of Northern Ireland in 2013 and is the Associate Head of School of Law at Ulster University.  As a practising barrister, he has developed a largely civil practice representing individuals, companies and public bodies in litigation. This covers a wide range of areas including personal injuries, wills and employment law. In terms of employment law, he has represented both applicants and respondents in the Industrial Tribunal.   At Ulster University, Jason lectures extensively on the civil areas of practise such as Equity and Trusts and delivers employment law lectures for both undergraduate and postgraduate students.

Background

The claimant had one year service with the respondent until January 2020 when she was dismissed by way of a WhatsApp message without any procedure being undertaken at all.   The claimant subsequently claimed for statutory redundancy pay, unfair dismissal and issues relating to notice pay, holiday pay and unlawful deduction from wages.  The Respondent did not attend the hearing.

In terms of the statutory redundancy pay it was held by the Tribunal that this claim had to fail as the claimant did not have the requisite length of service (two years).  However, on the unfair dismissal claim it was held that the dismissal was automatically unfair, unsurprising considering no procedure was undertaken whatsoever with the dismissal being communicated to the claimant only via a WhatsApp message.

The claimant was able to obtain further employment at the end of February 2020 and the Tribunal did note that it was disrupted by the effects of Covid-19 which they stated would have happened in any event if she had still been employed with the Respondent.  This does raise issues about how compensation may be altered if they had been different industries.   The sudden nature of the dismissal meant that she received no notice, nor did she receive the holiday pay that she had accrued.  Accordingly, the Tribunal awarded these sums to the claimant.

Practical Lessons

The decision to dismiss an employee by way of WhatsApp clearer falls foul of the statutory procedure required.  This will not be much of a lesson.  However, an interesting point is that the Tribunal did make mention that the new job for the purposes of compensatory award was also affected by Covid-19.  It may mean very little in practice or it could lead to the effect that differences in how industries/jobs were affected may then mean that the compensatory award may go up or down.

NI Tribunal decisions are available on the OITFET website:
http://www.employmenttribunalsni.co.uk/

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 20/05/2021