The Court of Appeal has ruled that domestic legislation in relation to consultation requirements cannot be read as excluding any matters not contained within the Collective Redundancies Directive. In this case, the closure of a US air base caused redundancies and let to a failure to consult claim on behalf of affected employees, including Mrs Nolan. The US specifically waived diplomatic immunity in their arguments before the tribunal and subsequent courts.
This case went to the CJEU on the big question of WHEN does an employer have to consult, known in legal circles as the Fujitsu issue:
"Does the employer’s obligation to consult about collective redundancies, pursuant to Directive 98/59, arise (i) when the employer is proposing, but has
Continue reading
We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.
Please log in to view the full article.
What you'll get:
- Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
- Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
- 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
- Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team
Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial