Valerie Beattie v Charis Cancer Care Limited & Friends of Charis Limited [2018]
Decision Number:
Legal Body: niit
Published on: 15/03/2018
Article Authors
The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
John Taggart BL
John Taggart BL
It looks like there isn't any content here just yet. Check back soon for updates and more information
Article Contributions on the Employment Law Hub
Case Law
Pora v Cape Industrial Services Ltd [2019]
Case Law
Nixon v Royal Mail Group Limited 2019
Case Law
BB v Department of Justice [2019]
Case Law
Frudd and another v The Partington Group Ltd [2019]
Case Law
Antuzis and others v DJ Houghton Catching Services Ltd and others [2019]
Case Law
Mr Jozsef Fitz v Holland and Barrett Retail Limited [2019]
Background
The claimant worked as a volunteer for the respondent charity and claimed constructive dismissal. She was the main driver behind the establishment of a shop outlet and indeed it was she who found the premises and negotiated with its owner to rent it to the charity.
Much of the claimant’s case was based upon her assertion that she was in fact the manager of the shop, implying a formal position, with a contract of employment. While the claimant was separately appointed as a salaried fundraiser she received no salary for working in the shop and there was no evidence of a formal management structure within the shop.
The tribunal concluded that the true legal situation was that there was no actual designated employment role of shop manager. It further noted that its conclusion did not mean that there was not a need for one, nor that the claimant did not de facto manage the shop. The claimant was held not to have been an employee and therefore could not be dismissed, constructively or otherwise, from a job which did not exist. The claim was dismissed.
Practical Lessons
This case raises an interesting question about the legal position of volunteers. There is no legal definition of a 'volunteer' and no legislation exists covering employer-volunteer relationships. Their status is obviously important as the extent of the rights acquired is dependent on whether they are an 'employee' or a 'worker' or even a genuine volunteer.
This case was complicated slightly by the fact that the claimant was employed separately as a fundraiser but that role differed substantially from her role in the shop.
Employers will find it easier to rebut any claims of employment by avoiding financial remuneration or anything which may be considered ‘consideration’ which points towards an employment contract. Some sort of ‘volunteer agreement’ which clarifies the role of the volunteer and expectations is preferable. This should not be an adapted contract of employment and should avoid specific obligations since, unlike employees, volunteers are free to come and go as they wish.
Continue reading
We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.
Already a subscriber?
Please log in to view the full article.
What you'll get:
- Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
- Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
- 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
- Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team
Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial
Disclaimer
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.
This article is correct at 15/03/2018
Q&A
How to handle it
Legal Island’s LMS, licensed to you
Imagine your staff having 24/7 access to a centralised training platform, tailored to your organisation’s brand and staff training needs, with unlimited users.
Learn more →