A Staff Member is on Maternity and Redundancies are Being Proposed- How do I Handle it?
Published on: 17/01/2023
Issues Covered:
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Patricia Rooney Partner and Head of the Employment Team, Tughans
Patricia Rooney Partner and Head of the Employment Team, Tughans
Patricia rooney

Patricia is Partner and Head of the Employment team at Tughans.


Patricia is a senior lawyer with extensive experience in dealing with both contentious and non-contentious employment matters. Patricia specialises in TUPE/outsourcing matters and regularly advises administrators on redundancy, “pre-pack” administrations and their TUPE obligations.


Patricia is qualified in NI and ROI and works regularly with clients with an all-Ireland presence. She is also qualified in England & Wales. She has appeared in the Industrial Court on union recognition matters, in the Industrial & Fair Employment Tribunal, before the NI Court of Appeal, and before the WRC and Labour Court in Ireland and the Employment Tribunal.


Patricia is very highly regarded, with a broad range of clients across all sectors, advising on all aspects of employment law, from recruitment to dismissal. She has extensive experience in transactional work, working closely with her corporate colleagues and has broad experience in advising on mergers and acquisitions and TUPE/Service Provision Change.


Patricia regularly speaks on employment law and developments, presenting the Employment team’s breakfast briefings. She also lectures in the UU/Legal Island Post-Graduate Diploma in Employment Law and has provided tailored training and seminars on various topics and regularly writes articles, including monthly articles for an all-Ireland human resource training provider.
She is a member of the Council of the CBI in Northern Ireland as well as a member of the Employment Lawyers Group (NI).


Patricia’s clients include non-departmental public sector bodies and employers throughout the UK.

“As a result of the cost-of-living crisis our business is suffering financially, we are therefore intending to downsize and reduce operations. We are proposing to make a number of redundancies, this potentially includes an employee who is off on maternity leave, how should we handle this?”

Redundancy is a fair reason for dismissal and is often used to describe circumstances where an employer proposes to reduce the number of its employees for a variety of reasons which might include; economic pressure, business restructure, relocation or changes in products or services provided. While the law does not prevent an employer making redundancies, there are prerequisites to ensure redundancies are lawful, such as genuine grounds for redundancy, together with the use of fair selection criteria (as objective as possible) and a transparent redundancy process. You should take care to ensure that any criterion used is non-discriminatory in nature and does not unfairly disadvantage an employee in connection with being on maternity leave. For example, absence due to pregnancy should not be taken into account when scoring employees on attendance.

While there is no statutory process for redundancy which affects less than 20 employees, if you have a specific redundancy policy, you should ensure this is followed throughout the process.

As a starting point, you should remember that you must consult with employees in advance of any notice being given. In the event you intend to make 20 or more employees redundant at one site, the consultation period should last at least 30 days and you should consult with employee representatives. The consultation period should continue until any issues have been resolved and employees fully informed and you should take steps to ensure absent employees (including those on maternity leave) can fully participate in the redundancy exercise. In general terms, you should ensure the employee on maternity leave is kept updated on the redundancy process and remains actively involved in the consultation. You should consider adjustments where required, i.e. meet with the employee at their home, consult by video/telephone call and engage in consistent written correspondence. Failure to properly consult with any employee, particularly one on maternity leave, could result in claims of unfair dismissal and/or discrimination.

In any redundancy scenario it is imperative the above points are considered to avoid allegations of a sham or unfair redundancy selection and thereby mitigate risk of any claims for unfair dismissal and/or discrimination.

If you are considering making the absent employee’s role redundant purely on the basis she is on maternity leave, this dismissal would be automatically unfair and you would be putting the business at risk of a claim for unfair dismissal, as well as sex discrimination.

You should also be aware that under Regulation 10 of the Maternity and Parental Leave etc. Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1999, enhanced protection is afforded to employees on maternity leave. This legislation gives the employee priority over other employees (also at risk of redundancy) and is a rare example of lawful positive discrimination. You should take care not to inadvertently discriminate against male employees as demonstrated in the case of Eversheds Legal Services Ltd v De Belin. It was held in this case that those employees on maternity leave should only be treated more favourably than male colleagues to the extent that this is reasonably necessary to remove the disadvantages occasioned by their condition.

A woman on maternity leave has the right to return to the same job before she left so, if it is confirmed the employee’s current role is redundant and it is not possible to continue to employ her under the existing contract, as per Regulation 10, she is entitled to be offered a suitable, alternative vacancy within the business (if one is available). The employee must be given priority before other potentially redundant employees and does not need to formally apply for the vacancy.

When considering alternative vacancies you should ensure that:

  • The alternative role starts immediately following the end of the employee’s current contract.
  • The role/work is suitable and appropriate for the employee in the circumstances.
  • The terms and conditions of the alternative vacancy are not substantially less favourable than if she continued to work under the previous contract (i.e. capacity, salary, place of employment etc.).

You should also take into account the effect redundancy will have on the employee’s Statutory Maternity Pay (SMP). If the employee is dismissed by reason of redundancy, you must continue to pay her SMP for the remainder of the SMP period, as her SMP entitlement, once triggered after the Qualifying Week (the 15th week before the week the baby is due) is not dependent on remaining your employee.

There is a lot to consider in any redundancy process, including fair selection criteria, the statutory dismissal process and appeals, but particularly so when pregnant employees or those on maternity leave are at risk of redundancy. You should therefore ensure you take the necessary steps to ensure the process is fair.

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 17/01/2023