Q&A: Can employers remove derogatory union notices?
Published on: 28/04/2025
Issues Covered:
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Chris Fullerton Partner in the Employment Law Group, Arthur Cox LLP
Chris Fullerton Partner in the Employment Law Group, Arthur Cox LLP
Chris fullerton from arthur cox ni
LinkedIn

>Chris is a partner in the Employment Law Group of the Arthur Cox Belfast Office in Northern Ireland.

Chris has extensive experience dealing with both contentious and non-contentious employment law matters. Chris advises a range of employers on all aspects of employment law including executive appointments, severance, grievances, disciplinary issues and trade union matters. Chris has represented clients before the Industrial Tribunal, Fair Employment Tribunal and the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland in employment litigation such as unfair dismissal, equality/discrimination and whistleblowing. Chris’ practice area includes advisory work and corporate transactions.

Stay ahead of the curve with our exclusive Q&A series, brought to you by leading law firm, Arthur Cox, LLP, designed to answer your most pressing legal questions. These expert insights provide clear guidance to ensure your HR practices remain compliant and protect your organisation.  

This month's question:

Can an employer take down trade union notices if they contain derogatory comments about the employer? Can the Union Representatives be disciplined for this?

Generally, the legislation provides that an employer cannot subject an employee to any detriment, particularly if that act had the sole purpose of preventing the employee from taking part in trade union activities or to punish them for doing so. 
The first key point to consider is the action or omission of the employer, particularly if it was their “sole or main purpose”. If this is found to be in the case, then the employee is likely to be protected by the legislation. 

However, not all trade union activity is protected. For example, more extreme and malicious acts are less likely to be afforded protection. A good standard for employers to use is whether that the conduct would normally justify a dismissal. It was not the purpose of this protection to be used as an excuse or cloak for conduct that would otherwise be a ground for dismissal.

It should be recognised that the primary purpose of trade unions is to be a safe platform to voice legitimate criticism. The legislation has been drafted to afford these protections so as long as the employee’s actions did not stray into the extreme and unreasonable.

Therefore, in practice, employers should be careful and recognise that this should be analysed on a case by case basis. By using the standard of what would normally constitute a dismissal, employers can better gauge and inform their response without breaching the employee’s union rights.

This article was contributed by the Employment team at Arthur Cox LLP

Telephone: +44 28 9023 0007
Website: https://www.arthurcox.com/

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 28/04/2025